Archive for the 'Other' Category

The Ability to Watch and Enjoy a Movie

I’ve been thinking about movies a lot lately… well, ok, nothing new. But still, I was thinking, it’s pretty amazing that we’re able to watch movies, or tv, or read books, or watch theater, wahtever – and even though we know that what we’re watching isn’t really happening, that it isn’t real, we’re still able to be emotionally affected by the events that we see.

It’s amazing that the human mind can do that, understand that something isn’t true on one level, but then still let those same things have such a profound impact on us. Imagine that an alien came to our planet who couldn’t do this for whatever reason. They would see a movie and just not believe it, they would not comprehend the true characters, and they would only see actors. Most art would be irrelevant to this alien, because it could not suspend belief, even emotionally to understand anything that’s happening.

Speaking of actors – it’s even more amazing that we can see the same actors in dozens of movies and still believe them to be different characters and people every time, while still knowing that they’re still acting. This dual-minded ability, whatever you call it is so much a part of our society and how we interact within it. Graphical user interfaces on computers are also based on this idea – they try to replicate things in real life – a button in a computer program is based on a buttons in real life – but what if we couldn’t comprehend the fact that those pixels were a button, and we couldn’t get past the fact that we KNOW it’s not a real button?

Weird.

Mice epidemic

I was emailed this by my brother Alex… Don’t watch this if you have even the slightest fear of mice. Seriously. It’s that scary. That’s one reason why I’m not embedding it. It’s a very disturbing video. Not like graphic violence or anything, but like freak people out a lot.

Mice Epidemic video (YouTube)

Ewwww!!! I shouldn’t have watched that. The thought of those mice just streaming out is enough to give someone nightmares for the rest of their life.

Then, if that’s not enough, be sure to check out this mouse that is literally a mouse. (Thanks Presurfer and Mom)

“Photoshop” not a verb

From the Adobe Terms of Use:

The Photoshop trademark must never be used as a common verb or as a noun. The Photoshop trademark should always be capitalized and should never be used in possessive form, or as a slang term. It should be used as an adjective to describe the product, and should never be used in abbreviated form.

And then, look how they go on:

The following examples illustrate these rules:

Trademarks are not verbs.

CORRECT: The image was enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® software.
INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.

And to top it off with the big finale…

Trademarks are proper adjectives and should be followed by the generic terms they describe.

CORRECT: The image was manipulated using Adobe® Photoshop® software.

INCORRECT: The image was manipulated using Photoshop.

All I can say is: Ah, shaddup. I know that Adobe has a copyright to protect and everything, but it just seems so… mean and pointles. Google has no problem making their “trademark” a verb… It’s in the dictionary now. I guess I’m over-reacting, but this is really just so stupid!

[Via Digg]

Oh! and on a completely unrelated note, you should definitely check out this picture that was enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® Elements® software!

The image enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® Elements® software pokes fun at the Product® Red® campaign, and at Apple Inc.’s® constant updating of their iPod® Nano® line of iPods®.

I’m finding that I’m having a lot of fun while playing with Adobe® Photoshop® Elements® software, you should all get it from Adobe® as soon as you can so you can do more stuff like this image enhanced with Adobe® Photoshop® Elements® software.

Jott things down, minus the pen

Lifehacker posted about Jott, and (I think) my Uncle Bob read it, who then “Jotted” my Mom, who then told me about it. But what is Jott? It’s a little bit hard to explain, but I’ll try.

Basically, Jott is an online web service that allows you to call a number on your cell phone, and the, tell it WHO you want to “Jott.” You can either Jott yourself, or one of your imported email contacts (you did this on the computer earlier.) It then records your 30 second message. Then, about 5 minutes later you (or your contact) should get an email with your speech translated to text.

And now you ask: “But is the Speech-to-Text really THAT good?” And I answer: “If only it were so. It’s actually too good, and my sources tell me (my Uncle Bob) that they actually just have people listening to your message and transcribing it.”

So yes, the idea that someone is just “translating” what you’re saying takes away some of the coolness, but this tool can actually be very useful. For instance, you could be in the waiting room for a doctor’s appointment and you suddenly remember that you haven’t sent out Thank You notes yet – but no problem! You just pull out your cell phone and Jott the message to yourself, so when you get home there’s an email waiting for you literally telling you to send out Thank You notes! (Even though it’s already April)

I’ve tried many times to make contact with these mysterious Transcribers by talking to them in my messages, I’ve even played them music – but all atempts have been futile…

I have a quick question. Will Jott stay free after it’s out of Beta? I thought probably not, but if yes, then at the end of this sentence, put two periods, if no, put one period Please do this, it would mean a lot to me, I just want to know

So they go ahead and put no periods!

transcriber enjoy this music, it’s very good music. [inaudible]

“Inaudible”??? That’s it! A “Thank You” might of been a little bit more polite!

The universe is pretty big

I just discovered this cool flash app that shows everything from neutrons all the way to the universe ourself – in scale. Very cool, done by Nikon

The Universe to Scale

[Thanks Digg]

OpenArena – a free and fun game

Openarena_logo.gifOpenArena is a free, open source, 3D, first person shooter based on the Quake 3 engine (but you don’t need Quake 3 to play the game.) And it’s very cool.

Yes, it’s a mindless video game – but I don’t care, it’s still fun. It’s easy to download from the website (Only 72 MB) and to play on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

The basic thing is that you go around shooting people and garygoles with all sorts of different guns. It’s not THAT violent, there’s not too much else there besides just shooting people and capturing a flag one map, but it’s still a great way to let out stress after a long day at school.

About system requirements, they’re like 256 MB or RAM I think, and it works well on my computer as long as the resolution is below 800×600 – and the graphics are great (for what it is) by the way.

open-arena.jpgopenarena_water_n.jpg

Why candy canes are overrated

Candy Canes are way overrated, here’s why:

1. Although the shape may look cool, and be good for hanging, when you try to eat a candy cane the shape gets in the way and it’s hard to eat.
2. They get really sharp at the ends once you suck on them for a while – safety hazard!
3. The red part is only a thin layer on the top (or at least on the ones that I’ve had) so it’s not REALLY swirly.

4. It’s just like those mints in the size of a cane!

    Blending an iPod

    What would we do without YouTube?

    [youtube]B8H29jU8Wrs[/youtube]

    The remnants are being sold on Ebay, where it’s currently going for $580 with a free blender and t-shirt added on.