The Da Vinci Code: a very controversial book that has been very popular for the past few years. Over the spring break, and on the eve of the movie coming out starring Tom Hanks, I decided to read it and see what I thought…
The plot starts out with a murder in the Louvre museum in Paris, the curator was murdered, but he had aranged himself like Leonardo Da Vinci’s “The Vitruvian Man” and written a code on the floor beside him. The main character, Robert Langdon and Sophie Nevue then must follow this dead man’s clues through Paris, going from one code to the next, trying to uncover this man’s dying secret. We are told the theory that Jesus actually had a wife, and that he may of even had kids, and a bloodline could still be alive today. There are more mysteries than just this, and Dan Brown (the author, in case you were wondering) takes the reader on a ride through Da Vinci’s paintings, churches, bank vaults, museums and more across Paris.
Brown does a terrific job at keeping the story interesting, surprising, but not TOO surprising, which I think is what will eventually be the TV show Lost’s downfall, to many twists and turns. The story blends religion, history, and modern day things like cell phones together in a way that many people cannot do. The book questions the entire Christian faith, and mentions some of the church’s… more violent actions in the past. Once you dive into this book, it is very hard to put it down. Despite it’s title being “The Da Vinci Code”, less than the first third of the story focuses on Da Vinci’s code. Once it’s found out what it is, it kind of leaves Da Vinci behind and him an his paintings are less significant to the rest of the story - what the paintings suggest, are significant though.
What I like most about this story is the way that Brown takes certain things, like that instead of 12 men at Da Vinci’s “The Last Supper” their appear to be only 11, and one women - Jesus’s wife. He then takes theory’s that people have had and combining them with other theorys to create an entire history of things, that makes the book such a fascinating read.
There are some things that I didn’t like about The Da Vinci code. First, the epilogue wasn’t an epilogue. It was the climax. So it needed a real epilogue. Also, at times it did seem to be a little bit far fetched, the ideas that Brown was suggesting, but hey, Lost is a lot worse. In addition, the seemingly bad guys were shown much lighter sides in the end, which I think kind of ruined the effect. Anyway, I give this book:
[rating:4]
_________________________________________________
Now I’m reading another one of Dan Brown’s books, featuring the same main character, Robert Langdon that was written before The Da Vinci Code called “Angels and Demons.” Review coming for that one once I finish it.
Inspired by
We finally got the DVD from Netflix this weekend, and we all sat down to watch “The Gay Cowboy Movie”. There was/still is soooo much controversy about this movie and how they’re gay, and how the movie is still a beautiful movie, etc. My mom saw it in theaters, and said that it was pretty good, but loooong. It’s actually only a little bit over 2 hours.
) on the sidebar down by “Latest”. It’s RSS 2.0. Aaron is 





Crash won the Academy Award for best film this year, surprising most people who were rooting for Brokeback Mountain. I had not seen Crash, so obviously it was on my (and our family’s) Netflix list. Finally, it has come and we all sat down to watch the film this past Sunday night.

I saw this movie a few weeks ago after spotting it on TV, which I instantly recorded with the powers of DVR. This scary thriller is beyond other horror films. The basic storyline is this: You watch a video that apparently has a lot of random images - a women brushing her hair, a light house, a basement, and someone jumping off a cliff, etc. - and at the end of the video you see “the ring” (in poster at left) and then you get the phone call “You’re gonna die in 7 days” a eerie, whispery voice says, and hangs up.
It’s long been known that children aren’t allowed to bring cell phones to school because the Department of Education doesn’t allow cell phones, iPods or ANY electronics in any public schools. First off, this is stupid. Cell phones are, first of all, a device that has saved thousands of lives, and second of all, bought by parents for their kids SO THAT IF THEY’RE IN TROUBLE THEY CAN CALL….. lets see; where are kids our age most of the day? At school! So what’s the point of having a cell phone if you can’t even have it for the majority of the day???????!!!!!!!!! Now our school has a policy, don’t let us see it, and we won’t say anything. We’re allowed to have them, but they should be off.
